Romanian Parliament grants license to kill stray dogs.

Urged in early September by President Basescu to legalise mass killing of stray dogs, the Romanian Parliament reacted immediately. On September 10th the plenary granted local authorities the license to start killing the dogs immediately. The President's demands arose after a recent and well-covered tragedy. This decision has no ethical, technical or financial ground. In the past, the government has culled 140,000 dogs using public funds and still the situation remains unsolved. The new law sends Romania back to the stone age.

In the meantime, animal haters have start the torture and killing of stray dogs. Authorities are tolerating these actions. FOUR PAWS' veterinarians are being forced to stop neutering and treating injured strays, but they are bravely continuing their work and trying to save as many dogs as possible. Over 100,000 friendly dogs have been neutered and released by FOUR PAWS' Stray Animal Care teams in the last decade. The authorities want to kill them too.

Stray dogs have been part of urban and rural Romania for decades. So far, there have been few incidents where humans and strays have come in conflict. Unfortunately, when these incidents occur, it is often due to lack of public awareness and proper management of the situation by the local authorities.

About one million dogs will be killed in the upcoming days and months, gratifying the country's leaders and baying public. However, this unethical and reactive decision is far removed from the real solution to manage the stray dog situation in a humane way.

-FOUR PAWS

 Give the Romanian stray dogs a chance to live

Possible mass murder of strays - once again

 Once again a tragedy of a human death brings a wave of hate towards the stray dogs in Romania. Below is an open letter written by Anu Raatikainen that is extremely well written and to-the-point. Please send your letters to at least the following email addresses:

procetatean@presidency.ro ; relatiicupublicul@aspa.ro ; relatiipublice@pmb.ro ; redactie@hotnews.ro ; martorocular@realitatea.net ; contact@evenimentul.ro ; reporter@corect.com ; redactia@romanialibera.ro ; dumitru.parvu@politiaromana.ro ; mimpiarr@gmail.com ; stirileprotv@protv.ro ; florentin.robescu@politiaromana.ro ; sesizare@mpublic.ro ; presedinte@mturism.ro ; info@mdrap.ro ; amr@amr.ro ; aor@aor.ro ; drp@gov.ro ; info@mdrap.ro ; petitii@mai.gov.ro ; relatiipublice@just.ro ; info@brasovultau.ro ; redactia@brasovultau.ro ,
romaniatravel@btconnect.com, info@RomaniaTourism.com, Rumaenien@aon.at ; office@romania.it; China@RomaniaTourism.co, ,info.rumunia@wp.pl, info@GuideRoumanie.com; info@romaniatravel.ru ; Muenchen@Rumaenien-Tourismus.de, ; oficina@RumaniaTour.com

On September 2, 2013, very tragically a 4-year old child was killed by a dog when he unattended entered a private property occupied by guard dogs. As a result of this tragic event most of the media is fanning hatred toward dogs and the president of Romania is the leader of the angry mob.

The president wishes to pass a law in super speed and in the heat of the furious moment that would allow to kill all the dogs without an owner. According to him this would solve all the problems in regard to stray animals and Romania would be happy and safe country ever after – or would it?

Looking at the recent history of Romania dogs have been mass murdered for the last 20 years. Despite the fact that local and international animal welfare organizations and thousands of private EU citizens have frequently petitioned the highest officials of Romania to adopt a neuter and release practice, which is recommended by the WHO and the only effective way to manage stray dog population.

The sad truth is that this tragic event didn’t even have to happen, if the Romanian government and local authorities had adopted the neuter & release program some years ago. The number of strays would be sufficiently lower already.

Similar accidents like this occur also in other countries from time to time, however people always understand that these are individual cases and there is no need for mass hysteria nor hatred speeches against dogs. Now the president of Romania bluntly fails to see this event as an individual case, which it is, and the mass media obediently repeats the hate mantra. The killings of dogs never stopped in Romania, as the officials are nearly never taking animal welfare issues seriously, but now the brutal killings have speeded up with the blessing of the president. All this makes one wonder, what kind of effect these brutal killings and abuses have on children, those who everyone apparently wishes to protect with these actions. Now millions of children are daily exposed on brutal acts of violence which will cause them trauma.

One cannot help wondering if this blind rage and brutal massacre against all dogs is even meant to solve anything or is it just a feeble justification for sadistic acts for people who would be much better off in psychiatric therapy?

Sadly first the friendly sociable dogs are killed, many of them in no doubt some child’s best and maybe the only friend. Also sadly the media nor the president is not interested in news whenever a dog saves a baby or a child. No interviews or TV discussion for the hero stray dog saving a new born baby in snow in sub-temperatures.

Last but not least, let’s ask ourselves, is this planned new law really representing Romania to the world as a civilized, responsible country worth respect, investment and maybe a visit and is it really doing the job in developing Romania to a better safer place to all?

Also visit the following facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/pages/Media-Bank-of-Romanian-stray-dog-abuse/160034624197722

UPDATE 6th September 2013:

The horror in Romania continues as every single dog on the streets of Romania is in danger of brutal torture and death. The first ones to die are the trusting, loving dogs who don't fear humans...after that, all the rest.

The dog in the picture was tortured by a brutal person who hit him with an axe and carved out his eye.

Not only the animals are in danger now, but also all the animal lovers and helpers in Romania are targeted by this insane hate that has taken over the country. The pain and sorrow of all animal activists is beyond words.

"People say when you are healthy you feel none of your organs in your body, and this is a good sign. Since our president talked on the news and asked for the mass killing of the dogs my heart become a big and heavy rock that I feel in my chest all the time, trembling. I think all animal lovers in Romania feel the same. We look at all the stray dogs we see on the streets and wonder what we'll do when we know that we don't have any more place to take them, and leaving them on the streets will mean leaving them to a sure death? Not only will the dogs be tortured with this new law, all animal lovers from romania that fight so hard for them so many times before will be tortured with the dogs.

For all that know what the love for animals is, you know what this will do to us....please fight for us and ask EU to step in, to help not only with words, but with money...ask them to invest in big shelters, in big neutering programs. Words will not help now, but a concrete plan offered by EU to romania will help." - Asociatia Ador

I urge you to visit the following link: Romania a country cries out for revenge after the tragic death of a four-year-old boy who had been attacked by dogs

 

A statement about the situation in Giurgiu, Romania by Magda Radu

Please take a moment of your time to read this informative statement made my Giurgiu's most effective and important animal advocate Magda Radu.

https://www.facebook.com/notes/magda-radu/my-public-statement-about-giurgiu/603702819663937

Those donating for Magda Radu and Magda's Angels Place - READ!

Unfortunately, there seems to be some sort of confusion for some regarding the difference between Magda's Angels Place and Giurgiu Shelter.

This bulletin is meant as a clarification for people to better understand the difference.

Magda Radu and the private shelter she runs is called Angels Place and is LOCATED in Giurgiu, Romania - the Romanian county (see the map below).

This is not to be confused with the public shelter of Giurgiu which has nothing to do with Magda or Angels Place.

It seems - due to language barriers or lack in research on the subject - that people confuse Giurgiu shelter with Magda Radu's Angels Place and vice versa.

For further clarification, the ONLY account for donations to Magda Radu and Magda's Angels Place is:

PAYPAL: phoenix_animale@yahoo.com

IBAN and Swiftcode:
NGO Phoenix-animal protection and human care;
RO95BTRL01904205852050XX
swift BTRLRO22GRA

Independently funded shelters - UPDATED 2 march 2012

In a country such as Romania, where there’s a desperate need for animal welfare movements, independent, non-government associations and organizations, as well as individual people are a small, yet driving force for the improvement of the well being of strays. It also brings, slowly yet (in the end) inevitably, a change in overall attitudes towards the canine population. Process is always slow in countries like this, but it is there.

For instance, one town in Romania – Oradea – seems to have gotten its act together long enough to actually do something successful about the stray dog population. In 2003, there were an estimated 7000 stray dogs in Oradea. In 2010 there were less than 700, all as a result of a well-organized “catch, sterilize and release” program conducted jointly by the city and a local NGO (non-government organization). http://www.sosdogs.ro/sosdogs.php?act=viewdoc&docid=1&la=3

Now there is a county we all can refer to as an example, a pioneer, an existing proof for the skeptics that catch/neuter/return is a functioning system and solution to the stray problem.

Even when the corrupt people running the show manage to downplay the results, the pressure put by, most importantly, the locals, as well as global condemnation and EU (which will happen eventually – Eurogroup for Animals, for instance, has made progress in getting the European Council to include companion animals as part of the next Animal Welfare Action Plan). Again, the process is slow, but it is happening.



Shelters run by independent people/organizations/associations

For some reason, I've always been a bit wary when it comes to big organizations. Mostly because a big chunk of the money donated actually goes into other parts of "the big wheel" of the organization - without the donator really having any knowledge where. However, I do understand that in order to get visibility, campaigns etc, money is needed. But misuse of funds donated, corruption and lack of transparency unfortunately darkens trust in organizations where "big" money is involved. With small associations or independent people, it is easier to build trust, to talk directly to the people involved and have your money go where it's supposed to go. That's my personal experience, at least.

But, as always when dealing with people, caution is advised.

The way I see it, bigger associations/organizations, in addition to personal donations, should focus on getting companies and businesses (+ government funding etc) to sponsor them and what they do, as well as apply for grants from different grant foundations ( http://foundationcenter.org/getstarted/nonprofits/ ). This way they will gain more visibility and awareness, as well as make an even greater impact with their cause.

With smaller associations the chances for approved sponsorships (by companies etc) and grants are much more difficult. They rely almost entirely on donations from independent people to do what they do.

Trustworthy Associations

The associations and shelters this blog is going to promote are all "backed up" by reliable Finnish registered associations, one of them being Pelastetaan Koirat ry - dedicated to the welfare of strays in Estonia, as well as changing people's attitudes towards animals, both in Finland and Estonia, and dog adoptions. Pelastetaan Koirat ry's ideology has always been to help where help is most needed, and has recently extended its help to Romania.

A need-to-read Bulletin from PK (Pelastetaan Koirat ry) mostly to Finnish citizens (but it applies to all:

Rescue Associations point out: There are always risks associated with private imports of rescued dogs (meaning dogs imported to Finland privately, not through any associations).  

 More and more Finns want to get a rescue dog from a shelter they've found via Facebook or some other social media. The dog that melted your heart might not be from a shelter supported by the Finnish Associations. In this case, the proper knowledge on rules and regulations, i.e necessary procedures, vaccinations, import regulations etc needed might be unfamiliar to the person/shelter you're getting the dog from. Often the people sending the dog are poorly informed on admission requirements.
 
The risk is higher when there is a lack of close co-operation between the people involved. You might end up scammed, or risk bringing dangerous diseases to Finland. Regulations are there for a good reason.
 
Kodittomien koirien ystävät ry and Pelastetaan Koirat ry  are concerned about the growing trend to adopt a homeless dog from abroad without the expert help of the associations. "Unfortunately, the phenomenon is more about good will and good intentions than know-how," says Salla Honkapää from Pelastetaan Koirat ry.


"The Adoption program is the outcome of in-depth work. That's why we visit the locations and the dogs many times, negotiating and agreeing on all the important points on paper," said Kodittomien Koirien Ystävät ry's spokeswoman Marianna Lammi. "Only then we can begin to work."

"The health program is being developed and updated constantly to ensure the continuation of the dog rescue operation, so that it does not compromise the disease situation in Finland. These important pieces of safety structure are missing when adopting outside the organizations", Salla Honkapää continues.

This may be forgotten, as the foreign animal welfare associations and dog kennels inform actively about their activity on the Internet. Facebook equalizes everyone to look like animal welfare experts.

When recorded into the Traces-system, the dog has been imported legally
 
In reality, private importation differs quite a lot from importation via registered Evira Associations. For example, each dog is reported to the Traces-system, which requires an official veterinary inspection.

Associations follow Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry's - and thereby the European Union's - import regulations concerning dog tag markings, rabies vaccinations and echinococcus treatment. Even more importantly, the associations know what other measures are required, and how extensive they should be.
 
"We are being asked almost weekly about the requirements for the importation of dogs from Romania to Finland. Formalities are taken seriously. However, they are still insufficient for ensuring the dogs health. Why this is and how to ensure it is for many foreign entities not clear. The health program in Romania should include rabies-, leptospirosis-, and 'quadruple'-vaccines, as well as a number of parasite tests. Not everyone has the necessary resources needed to do this," says Marianna Lammi.
 
Pity is not a reason
 
While co-operating, the Finnish association and the foreign party will learn about each other's "dog culture". The dog may be healthy by romanian standards, even though it might suffer from pain, and have unexplained skin problems. In Finland, many new facts about the dogs' health might be discovered, which at worst may be harmful to others as well as the dog itself.

Adoption also doesn't fit all dogs, but this may be forgotten when wanting to rescue a dog urgently to the security and warmth of a home.
"The association holds responsibility even after the transfer of ownership of the dog. The follow-up and support for the dogs adoptive family is an integral part of the adoption process. For a privately imported dog, the person is all alone," says Sally Honkapää.
 
"We are obviously pleased that Finns are open to adopt a homeless dog from abroad. Pity is still not reason enough to do it. We believe that a suitable dog fitting ones own life situation can also be found through responsible rescue organization sites. If not, we strongly suggest that the adopter personally retrieves the dog from its country of origin in order to guarantee the safety first-hand. This requires expertise," underlines Kodittomien Koirien Ystävät ry.
 
Both of these associations point out that the general public doesn't know how to distinguish between private rescue operations and rescue operations carried out by the associations, making it also about the reputation of the rescue dog programs. "If even one sick dog arrives to Finland from Romania, all rescue dogs will be stigmatized. No one will bother to ask who brought the dog to Finland", Honkapää says.

How to identify a reliable operator?
 
• The association is registered at Evira as a commercial importer of dogs.
• The Association registers all dogs into the Traces-system, and complies with the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry's admission requirements.
• The Association presents publicly a program in which the health situation of the dogs is examined as accurately as possible.
• The association describes the dog looking for a home realistically, informing that the personality of the dog may differ in the new home. A responsible association does not promise anything that can't be promised, like the dogs being perfectly healthy.
• The association does not force or hurry you to make a decision on dog adoption.

Public Shelters & Corruption

PUBLIC SHELTERS IN ROMANIA

The public dog shelters in Romania are funded by government money. A huge part of these shelters are nothing short from death camps for dogs despite legislation improvements. It has been reported by many animal welfare organizations, as well as by the locals, that nothing has changed, at least not for the better. Hundreds of thousands of strays are being killed in these public shelters by norm, the catching methods, care and nurture, treatment, euthanasia etc, all still remain cruel and inhumane. 
 
                                                                  

   Most publicly financed shelters are run by untrained, poorly educated, underpaid and all-out brutal personnel with no respect for animals. Most dogs die a horrible and cruel death long before they ever reach the shelters. And those who do end up in shelters wait, confined in tiny prisons, exhausted by fear, hunger and thirst, until they are finally killed by the cheapest methods possible. And that is putting it mildly… Euthanasia, by definition, should be an act of mercy, done by qualified veterinarians using painless and rapid methods (no.155/2001). In Romania this couldn’t be further from the truth.


Animal Welfare Laws in Romania:
http://www.protectiaanimalelor.ro/documente/Romania_Report_Animal_Welfare_Laws.pdf
 

 The ANSVSA (National Sanitary Veterinary and Food Safety Authority) is responsible for the supervision and conversion of these laws. They fail miserably, and regardless to numerous complaints, nothing is being done.

In order to see why the situation remains the same, we need to take a step back to see the whole picture. Killing of strays has become a profitable business in Romania, since corruption is a major issue in the country.

 The stray dog business in Romania - by Codrut Feher, FNPA

http://chatte-gossips.blogspot.com/2011/04/stray-dog-business-in-romania-by-codrut.html

  "Between 2001 and 2011 the Romanian animal control people have killed hundreds of thousands dogs by spending tens of millions of EUROs in public funds, while the number of stray dogs only grew larger.

  Under the pretext of the “stray’s terror” generous budgets were allocated. The Bucharest dog catchers spent about 13 million EURO in 7 years. The dog catchers in Brasov spent about 2 million EURO in 8 years. Overall it is estimated that Romania spent between 25 and 40 million EURO on strays from 2001 until 2008.

  Contrary to the popular belief that fuels the anti-stray protests, the money spent on food for the strays was just a infinitesimal part of the budget, as the dogs were being fed “subliminal” quantities, to quote the so called specialists from DSVA Brasov.

Out of a total budget of 1,500,000€ for 2008, the dog catchers in Brasov allocated only 5,000€ for the dog food, less than 3%. Instead enormous gas quotas were approved. In Brasov, 4 rundown old cars with easy to tamper with mileage tracking systems were each allocated about 350-400 l of gas per month, which means each car did about 100 km/day. Land was rented for the municipality shelters, despite that fact that local authorities had land they could build on. In Brasov, the municipality paid in 8 years more than 1,500EURO/month (170,000 EURO in total) to the owners of a former swine farm that was in really bad condition and it also invested in modernizing the farm. All of this while it could have built a brand new shelter with 15,000 EURO on a land it owned.

 About 100,000£ were annually spent on tranquilizers and lethal substances, but nobody ever checked that against the number of dogs reported caught and/or euthanized. These substances were bought illegally (without prescriptions), used illegally (because the dog catchers got lazy and started to catch all dogs with tranquilizers, committing two felonies at once) and may even have been used or sold as drugs (Vetased, the most used tranquilizer contains ketamine, which is used as a drug and is legally considered drug since 2010).

 - The business of gathering dogs;

 Several mayors with business “abilities” transformed the local animal control departments into businesses that made money by catching and killing dogs from small towns that didn’t have their own shelters, or by catching the dogs in a town without a shelter and “hosting” the dogs in a different city, tens of km away. The corrupt mayors became so addicted to these profits that they imposed quotas on their dog catchers: the Brasov dog catchers hunted in 4-5 counties, bringing over 120,000€ to Brasov’s budget. Most of the dogs were exterminated in the Stupini shelter and a small number were handed over to other cities that had shelters.

 The whole operation was made profitable at the price of torturing the animals and breaking the Romanian animal protection laws. After loading up the dogs and before heading for Brasov, the Brasov dog catchers would be paid per number of dogs for capture, transportation, sheltering and euthanasia.

 Since they were already paid and everyone saw them leaving with the dogs, nothing (certainly not their conscience) stopped the dog catchers from releasing most of the dogs on their way back to Brasov, to make sure that the problem continues and they are called back to “help”. Any animal lover would be happy to hear that, if they didn’t know that the dogs would be caught again and again, sometimes injured in the process, and would most likely continue to multiply.

 - The counting of the dogs;

 The audit of the activity of the dog catchers was a chimera. Nobody was really counting the dogs. Nobody knew how many dogs actually went through their hands, from capturing through incineration, especially since the documents for Protan (the incineration company) were filled out by the dog catchers themselves who approximated the weight of the bodies, filling in numbers with a lot of digits and even decimal points, and tried to make it match the number of dogs they claimed to have caught. It was very easy for them to claim, for example, that they caught 5,000 dogs while in reality they caught half of that number. The dogs that (fictionally) entered the center were also supposed to (fictionally) leave the shelter. On June 25, 2009, according to the official documents, between 131 and 54 dogs were killed in Brasov. A witness and several documents point to the fact that only 90 animals were killed and that those dogs were from Victoria, Fagaras and a few other towns. In November 4, 2009, the Brasov dog catchers captured 46 dogs in Covasna. People from Covasna were told that the dogs were in the Brasov shelter and people from Brasov were told they were in the Covasna shelter, but the dogs were not found in either shelter. On June 1st 2010 the Brasov dog catchers caught 48 dogs in Sangeorgiu de Mures and transported them to the Reghin shelter. The Reghin shelter received and registered only 25 dogs.

 Another way to make money was to manipulate the adoption numbers, especially the adoptions towards private shelters: adopted dogs were also counted as euthanatized. In 2008 at least 400 dogs were adopted from the Brasov dog catchers by the “Millions of friends” rescue association. In the official documents that number is 0!

 Finally, another way was to modify the number of deceased dogs, by recording a smaller number than the real one and accordingly increase the number of euthanized dogs. For 2008, the shelter mortality as it resulted from official records was of 79 dogs, meaning a dog died every 4 days. In the first months of 2009, the mortality was of only 23 dogs, meaning a dog did every 8 days. In reality, the number of dogs that died in the shelter is much higher: at least 300-400 in 2008 and at least 150 in 2009. And there were also the dead dogs that were found in the city and which had to be, of course, euthanized.

 Through all of these manipulations the animal control folks were gaining about 25-30 € per dog, by either selling the substances for euthanasia, or by writing fictional invoices, in complicity with folks from the veterinary supply deposits.

 - PROTAN and how to incinerate public money;

The incineration of a 20 kg dog costs 10 EURO (0.5 EURO/kg). Since most shelters don’t have weight scales and Protan reception documents specify that the quantity column should be filled out by the customer, the weight was eyeballed by the animal control folks. If you fictionally kill between 40 and 60 animals, you also need to approximate their weight and fictionally incinerate about 1,000kg, which brings Protan about $500 EURO.

If you extrapolate this schema to a whole year between 10,000 and 15,000 EURO were embezzled in Brasov only.

 It was obvious that this whole embezzlement mechanism was accompanied by a long term strategy to keep the animals on the streets. When they were out hunting in other cities the dog catchers were catching everything they could get their hands on, especially dogs with owners or protectors and dogs that were sterilized and returned to their territory according to HG 955/2004. There were cases where dogs were taken while walking next to their owners or where the dog catchers went into people’s yards and took their dogs. A lot of the owners tried to negotiate a return fee smaller than the official one and eventually, especially in Bucharest, a “protection fee” paid to the dog catchers became the norm.

 Although the problem of the aggressive dogs was supposedly the number one priority, the animal control folks rarely caught aggressive dogs. Instead they almost always took puppies and little, friendly dogs that were easy and safe to catch. This approach had the double benefit of keeping the dangerous dogs on the streets in order to perpetuate the “terror of the strays” while making the dog catchers appear as heroes and saviors in the eyes of the people.

 At the end of December 2007 the Deputies Chamber voted a modification of the Animal Protection Law(205/2004) also known as "Marinescu's Law".Among other things, this law classifies animal cruelty as a crime punishable by law and prohibits the euthanasia of healthy cats or dogs. It seemed as if common sense and logic had won over the hundreds of mayors and dogcatchers (who during 8 years managed to "bury" aprox. 35 million euros in a mountain of stray corps).Also, during the same time, in December 2007, the Senate modified the law concerning the strays and replaced euthanasia with spay/neuter and returning to territory, according to the WHO's guidelines. AND NOW COMES THE "PROBLEM"....These two new legislative measures would have solved the strays problem, leaving all of those who made big money from the "stray business" without their huge profits!!!

 -The conspiracy;

 All the dogcatchers and their "official sponsors" quickly realized that if the new legislative proposals (PL912) will be presented to the ADP in spring 2008, the new law will become definitive, as approved by the Senate.Their only chance was to postpone and prolong this indefinitely. This would have given the dogcatchers plenty of time to still operate as before , the solution wouldn't have been applied and it would present later on as the perfect excuse to suggest euthanasia of all strays as the number of strays would have grown even more.Their evil plan worked, as the new legislative proposal (PL912) still has yet to be presented to ADP since 2008!

 -ANSVA , DSVSA and other public institutions;

 Although euthanasia had been abolished, majority of public administrations across country continued the mass killing of strays , using the most absurd justifications: suddenly, all strays became terminally ill (backed up by false documents produced by corrupt state employees) or using "personal interpretation " of the law. All this was going on with the silent approval of the official services for animal protection, just as corrupt as the public administrations: ANSVSA and DSVSA.

 Thousands of strays were captured, the "lucky"ones being detained sometimes for a couple of weeks before their death in the official "shelters": filthy ,cold , very small cages, lying in their own feces, deprived of food and water, beaten and abused daily and then finally killed by untrained or uneducated dogcatchers, in the most cruel ways possible, suffering the most unimaginable pain till the last breath...

 Anybody that get the chance to see some of their official evidence of these atrocities would be appalled by the gruesome mistakes used to justify what they did .

 As many of these dogcatchers are paid by the local authorities , their only "enemy" are the NGO's. Therefore, they are doing their best to keep the NGO's as far away as possible, refusing any collaboration or cooperation with them.

 About a year later, once a few people started complaining about their dirty business, the almighty dogcatchers across the country started to be concerned and thus considered it's the perfect time to start changing the law according to their interest.

 The "chosen" one to formulate the new proposal of law was no other than Barbulescu Flavius ( famous for killing 30000 dogs in 8 years and having at least 6 legal complaints against him) , supported by Simona Panaitescu. Both of then had the "blessing" of Brasov's mayer, George Cripcaru, also known as "Dracula of dogs",prominent member of PDL (Democratic-Liberal Party) and a man used to manipulate the laws according to his best interests.

-Law to mass murder of Strays;

 Barbulescu's new law proposal included mass euthanasia of strays , banning the NGO's any involvement in the dogcatchers or municipal shelters activity, obstructing adoptions by implementing severe fines for people feeding or taking care of strays on the streets.

 Once Barbulescu's "masterpiece" was finished, they needed someone to make it public. And who better than Bucharest's prefect, Mihai Atanasoaiei, well known for his embarrassing public speeches and appearances. After that, the game moved on to Elena Udrea and Sulfina Barbu.

- Manipulation;

 Their biggest weapon is the manipulation of the population through mass-media. Their "servant" PRO TV always "deliver" twisting the facts and lying out in the open without remorse, just as long as they can blame something on the strays (e.g. The case of a woman attacked by dogs in a private yard, because she entered the premises at night, without any authorization, presented to the public as a woman killed by strays. The same type of story happened again, a drunk woman was attacked by dogs who had owners, and they also blamed the strays for her death. Even after the official reports from the investigations were released, PRO TV never rectified their stories , apologized, on the contrary, everyday they try to find more things that they can blame the strays for... And PRO TV is not the only one. There are other tv stations and newspapers in the same boat."

 SUMMARY/RECAP

 2007: The Senate votes PL 912/2007 that replaces the mass killing of strays with spay/neuter/release

 2008: Animal Protection Law prohibits mass euthanasia. (ADP from Deputies Chamber blocks the discussion of this law for 3 YEARS!!!)

Meanwhile, local authorities continue the killing and totally ignore the solution:spay/neuter/release. They are officially breaking the law and try to cover for all who do that also.

In Brasov, a German organization offered to spay/neuter all the city's strays, but were completely ignored by local authorities.

The only town were the mayor actually used spay/neuter/release programs was Oradea, and the results are showing: in 6 years the population of strays decreased 8 times.

So after 3 long years of blocking PL912 from being approved, the politicians want now to "solve" the stray problem by mass killing! Knowing very well that euthanasia is not a solution, they all want that as it is a guarantee for more dirty money to be made in the future from "the stray business". Spay/neuter/ return programs would only jeopardize their source of dirty profits!

2011: Sulfina Barbu sneaked in Atanasoaiei's new proposals of law (modifying PL912) which granted the mayors the liberty to decide on euthanasia or not. Animal lovers were protesting outside the Parliament's Building unnoticed...

On the 7th of March 2011, when ADP tried to vote the "new and improved "PL912 with Atanasoaiei's proposals, a miracle happened: the deputies decided to return the law to the Commission to allow the NGO's and Animal Welfare groups to be consultants and the law to be re-discussed after 3 weeks.

This delay "caught by surprise" a lot of mayors too, who already counted on the mass euthanasia to be approved and were "ready" to take action, having everything ready to do "the job". And strangely enough , during these 3 weeks more and more cases of strays shot, poisoned, beaten to death, burned, abused and tortured appear every day, all over the country.

Please spread the word! EVERYONE NEEDS TO KNOW ABOUT THESE THINGS!



Corruption


Transparency International; a global civil society organization leading the fight against corruption, in its latest reports, rank Romania at 75. in the 2011 Corruption Perceptions Index that measures the perceived levels of public sector corruption around the world. A country/territory’s score indicates the perceived level of public sector corruption on a scale of 0 - 10, 0=Highly Corrupt 10=Very Clean. Romania’s score: 3,6.

In the Global Corruption Barometer 2010 report, Romania placed poorly when under intense scrutiny.

 Question 1: In the last 3 years, how has the level of corruption changed?

Question 2: To what extent do you perceive the following institutions in this country to be affected by corruption? (1: not at all corrupt, 5: extremely corrupt)

 
Question 3: How would you assess your current government’s actions in the fight against corruption?

 

http://www.transparency.org/policy_research/surveys_indices 

Need-To-Read Links:

http://www.piaberrend.org/romania-organized-crime-and-stray-dog-business-cruella-de-vil-would-be-proud/ 

http://bricabraccc.wordpress.com/2011/12/01/re-recent-euthanasia-policy-in-romania-and-e-u-responsibilty-oversight/

http://www.protectiaanimalelor.ro/documente/Romania_Report_Animal_Situation.pdf

http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/regions/europe/110429/bucharest-romania-stray-dogs

http://www.strayanimalrights.org/en/europas-laender/rumaenien

http://www.vier-pfoten.eu/website/output.php?idfile=2872

http://pfotenhilfe-europa.eu/1709.html

http://xnici.wordpress.com/2011/05/17/a-must-read-note-the-declaration-of-a-famousexcellent-trustworthy-romanian-veterinarian-about-the-massacre-in-botosani/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3k8Kvk_LaTA&feature=related

To understand the situation in Romania - History and Mentality (Remade April 2012)

In order to understand how the stray dog situation came to be what it is today, we need to take a look back.

All the information below is from the Case Study: Romania by Liviu Harbuz,  President of College of Romanian Veterinarians

Historic background:

• From 1970 to 1989 in Romania demolition work let stray dogs roam freely in the streets and nobody took care of the control of reproduction. 

• Rural population built their own farms. Around 80% of farmers owned a dog = a total of 3.2 million dogs and cats in rural areas.

• People blame former Romanian dictator Nicolae Ceausescu for the homeless dogs. In 1984, he razed the historic town center to create the House of the Republic, now the Palace of Parliament, a communist monstrosity that is the world's largest civilian administrative building. As a result, an estimated 40,000 families were relocated to modern apartment buildings in which pets were forbidden. So they abandoned them to the streets.

• During this time, 60% of population lived in rural areas. 

•  Communist era – people were starving

•  People were poor but cared for animals

• There was a lack of education programs and parasite prevention, as well as a lack of identification and registration of pets.

• The only prevention method was anti-rabies vaccination. The vaccine caused side effects (encephalitis) to 15% of dogs; population became unwilling to vaccinate their dogs and cats.

• In Bucharest there were specialized salubrity services belonging to public institutions which dealt with catching and killing stray dogs; they were used for: 

                                                 -protein flour used to feed animals
                                                 -animal skin processing companies


Veterinary Background:

• Forest rabies spread by foxes expanded because of the lack of oral vaccination of these animals

• Rabid foxes were hunted, skinned, processed and offered as food to cats and dogs. Since parasite prevention was accidental, parasites lived the entire biological cycle (sheep – dog – man) on the farms.

• Many external and internal parasites were found only when a man became ill and was sent to a hospital, where he would be diagnosed with zoonoses. 

• In Romania there were only 30 veterinarians qualified to treat pets (dogs and cats).

• In the countryside, the dogs were kept in chain, hierarchically speaking being behind other farm animals.

• Dogs were fed with products and by-products derived from other species, so the epidemic situation was complex and perpetual

Social Background:

• The presence of stray dogs in parks, on playgrounds, in tourist resorts, on beaches, has caused a rejection response against pets from both authorities and restaurant and hotel owners.

• Under the circumstances there are many cases where people have understood to take justice into their own hands, because we are lacking well structured programs of the relevant authorities.

• It is depressing to see the count of dead dog scattered on highways, or even of people killed in traffic accidents, occurred because they attempted to avoid a dog or a horse loose on the road.

• Moreover, there are quite a few incidents when game is attacked by starving dogs, which are reverting to the condition of a wild animal.

Animal protection:

• Paradoxically, an animal protection program existed during the communist regime. There were non-governmental organizations which acted sporadically.

• Civil society was extremely active during the time of monarchy in Romania, between the two World Wars. The first organization for animal protection and the first animal protection law were founded in 1935. In 1938 there was a large number of professional organizations being set up, especially dealing with liberal professions, which developed significantly.

• The National Associations of Veterinarians was founded in this time. Veterinary medicine developed due to two factors: horses (which were used in the army, for sport, hunting and work) and dogs as pets and hunting.

• Once communism was installed, agriculture was collectivized and mechanized, and many horses used for farm work were killed. Horses used for recreation and dogs kept as pets were associated with capitalist society.

Animal protection legislation:

• The first 5 years after 1989 revolution, 10 NGO's dealing with animal protection appeared.

• In 1999 there were 36 animal protection organizations and more than 50 practices. Currently, there are over 130 organizations, over 230 practices and hospitals and over 60 private and public shelters for stray dogs.

• In 2001, the Government issued regulation 155, regarding the program of managing stray dogs, a regulation which was approved by Law 227/2002.

• In 2004, the Parliament passed Law 60, regarding the ratification of European Convention for pet protection. Also, authorities passed Law 205, regarding animal protection, which was modified and completed by Law 9/2008.

For a detailed take on the solution strategies for the canine overpopulation in Romania, please read the following link by Liviu Harbuz, President of College of Romanian Veterinarians.

http://www.vier-pfoten.eu/website/output.php?idfile=2872

• Romania ratified the European arrangement for the protection of home animals which came into force on the 01.03.2005.

• Romania is a member of the EU since 1.1.2007. Cruelty towards animals is against the EU values that Romania has adopted when joining the Community. 

"The Union and the Member States shall, since animals are sentient beings, pay full regard to the welfare requirements of animals, while respecting the legislative or administrative provisions and customs of the Member States relating in particular to religious rites, cultural traditions and regional heritage."

I hardly think abusing and killing stray dogs can in anyones book be seen as a romanian religious, cultural or regional tradition... Only education, information and a big change in common attitudes will change how people perceive these amazingly forgiving creatures.